Washington and the EU reject the Israeli occupation's decision to evacuate Masafer Yatta

  • May 11, 2022

The official spokesman for the US State Department, Ned Price, said that his government objects to the evacuation of the Masafer Yatta area by the Israeli occupation authorities.

Regarding the Israeli court’s May 4 decision approving the forced eviction of approximately 1,300 Palestinians from Masafer Yatta, Price said: “we’re aware of and we’re watching this case very closely. We believe it is critical for all sides to refrain from steps that exacerbate tensions and that undercut efforts to advance a negotiated two-state solution. This certainly includes evictions.”

A UN official and an Israeli human rights organization condemned the Israeli Supreme Court's giving the green light to evacuate the residents of Masafer Yatta in the southern West Bank.

The United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Lynne Hastings, said in a statement: “On 4 May 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court rejected the petitions against eviction orders of the residents of Masafer Yatta in the occupied West Bank. The decision affects over one thousand Palestinians including 500 children in the occupied West Bank and allows for the eviction of the residents. As all domestic legal remedies have been exhausted, the community is now unprotected and at risk of imminent displacement.”

She added that “Any such evictions resulting in displacement could amount to a forcible transfer, contrary to resolutions of the United Nations Security Council and international law. I reiterate the calls of the United Nations Secretary-General on Israel to cease demolitions and evictions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, in line with its obligations under international law.”

B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights defender, said “After more than 20 years of legal proceedings, Israel’s High Court of Justice ruled yesterday (May 4) that the forcible transfer of hundreds of Palestinians from their homes and the destruction of their communities – for the clear purpose of taking over their lands in the service of Jewish interests – is legal. The justices have thus proved once again that the occupied cannot expect justice from the occupier's court.”

It added that “The decision, weaving baseless legal interpretation with decontextualized facts, makes it clear that there is no crime which the high court justices will not find a way to legitimize. Employing sugarcoated language, hypocrisy, and lies, the justices once again fulfilled their role in Israel’s regime of Jewish supremacy and paved the way for the crime of forcible transfer to be committed, while reversing reality: the ruling cast Palestinian victims as the “unlawful” offenders, while portraying the apartheid regime as the victim.”

B'Tselem stressed that “The international community must prevent Israel from forcibly transferring the Masafer Yatta communities and make sure, should this crime be committed, that those responsible for it – including government ministers, the military top echelons, and the supreme court justices – will be held accountable.”

The European Union also condemned the Israeli Supreme Court's decision issued last week on the issue of eviction of Masafer Yatta in the hills south of Hebron in the occupied West Bank, which exposes about 1,200 Palestinians to forced displacement and demolishes their homes, and threatens the two-state solution.

The European Union said in its statement that “Settlement expansion, demolitions and evictions are illegal under international law. The EU condemns such possible plans and urges Israel to cease demolitions and evictions, in line with its obligations under international humanitarian and international human rights law. The establishment of a firing zone cannot be considered an “imperative military reason” to transfer the population under occupation.Furthermore, the EU recalls that demolitions and evictions, forced transfers including of Bedouins, severely threaten the two-state solution and will only escalate an already tense environment from which no one can truly benefit and which only further deteriorates the situation on the ground for ordinary people on both sides.”